THEME #1 SCIENTIFIC AND BIOLOGICAL INTERESTS

Symposium lectures by Tony Bidwell, Bryant Buchanan and Sharon Wise, Joan Roberts, and Stephen Lockley as well as the Lake St. Nora experiment together presented very convincing evidence that the quality of darkness has considerable impact on the natural world.

Participants heard about disruptions to organisms, ecosystems, and ecological functions that result from light pollution. Interference with the circadian rhythms of all living things was perhaps the most alarming impact of the oversaturation of light in the night sky.

Concerns were expressed about the effect of light pollution on the balance of nature through its impact upon such processes as pollination and the delicate aspects of the food web. The loss of natural adaptedness to the dark was cited as a true loss in terms of biodiversity.

From a different perspective, participants mentioned the high cost, environmentally and socially, of generating energy to light up the night sky. No matter the source — fossil fuels and hydroelectricity or nuclear power — the expense in "lighting up the bottoms of birds" seemed to those present to be excessive and often unnecessary.

Participants in this group cited the importance of diversity of environmental conditions that leads to resource partitioning and greater biodiversity. Some processes can only occur during darkness (e.g. rest, repair, celestial navigation, predation, charging of systems). From the research shared at the symposium, it was clear that darkness has the identical and complementary functional importance as daylight. It is necessary for the healthy functioning of organisms and ecosystems.

When confronted by the question about what issues should be addressed in this area, participants indicated that much more research is needed on the effects of light pollution to demonstrate the importance of the issue.

Public and government awareness would have to be heightened around the value of protection, prevention and reduction of this particular type of pollution. Public perceptions would need to be shifted with respect to light trespass and "second hand " light, the waste of too much night lighting and the importance of using the right lighting for the right situation.

Most participants felt that legislation would have to be developed to encourage and require dark sky friendly lighting through by-laws, altered engineering standards and building codes.

Participants

Tony Bidwell
Heather Kaye
John Riley
Al Sinclair
Bryan Buchanan
Sharon Wise
Michael Mesure
Jan McDonnell
Bob Bowles
Don Williams

Moderator

Don McCormick

Recorder

Donna Ried

THEME SUMMARIES MENU

  1. Scientific and Biological Interests
  2. Importance of the Night Sky to the Cultural, Spiritual and Historical Worlds
  3. Importance of the Night Sky to Human Health
  4. Achieving Dark Sky Compliance through Voluntary and Regulatory Means
  5. Recommendations from the Symposium Theme Sessions

Terms of Use
© EcologyoftheNight.org - Muskoka Heritage Foundation, 2004