THEME #4 ACHIEVING DARK SKY COMPLIANCE THROUGH VOLUNTARY AND REGULATORY MEANS

The participants in this session agree that behaviour change was needed in all areas:

Property owners

Residential
Commercial

Industry

Manufacturers
Architects
Designers
Developers
Dealers
Contractors
Professional associations such as OPPI, AMCTO, OPWA, OGRA, and Landscape Ontario

Provincial Government

Ministry of Transportation
Boards of Education

Community groups

Ratepayers
Service clubs
Citizen advisory groups
Environmental alliances

Municipalities

Heads and members of local councils
CAOs, lawyers, engineers, planners
Association of Municipalities of Ontario

Others

Insurance companies

When the group considered the options for facilitating change, they came up with a wide range of choice.

  • Media campaigns - TV commercials (TVO), trade magazines, Science TV
  • Extended public awareness campaigns focusing on the health issues
  • Incorporating the matter into lesson plans for the school curriculum and offering extra-curricular education programs e.g. through service clubs such as Boy Scouts/ Girl Guides etc.
  • Developing standardized municipal by-laws by offering templates
  • Encouraging provincial policy statements
  • Encouraging laws at the provincial and federal levels
  • Encouraging corporate direction buying policy (for commercial enterprises such as Loblaws, Canadian Tire, Wal-Mart)
  • Offering NGO certification of products

The group suggested that it might be effective to employ the strategy of leading by example followed by outreach. The participants suggested that training be offered to the decision-makers, regulators, and enforcers. Financial incentives are often used to change behaviour and were suggested to encourage night sky friendly behaviour. Often, partnering with existing programs works to bring attention to a new issue. If light pollution is paired with general health promotion or if a cub badge is offered in dark sky friendliness, the message may be better communicated.

When asked to consider the barriers to the successful implementation of the options noted above, the group cited ignorance of the issue as the prime barrier — Lack of knowledge and lack of awareness. The level of potential liability (e.g. crime, vandalism) with respect to adverse effects of different illumination needs to be demonstrated for municipalities and businesses alike.

The group agreed that limited resources and competing issues and agendas make it difficult to obtain the attention of government agencies.

The problem of the financial cost of implementing the options was thought to be considerable in terms of capital outlay, engineering expense and administrative costs (e.g. for enforcement). And the cost of lighting conversion was considered as a potential hardship for businesses.

Participants

Brian Whitehead
Jim LaFramboise
Remi Lacasse
Terence Dickinson
Tony Rutenberg
Chloe Legris
Peter Ryback
Robert Cowie
Barb Heidenreich
Robert Dick
Dorothy Shaver
David Welch
Martin Damus
Michael Barry
Rick Stankiewicz

Moderator

David Gibson

Recorder

Jill Attwood

THEME SUMMARIES MENU

  1. Scientific and Biological Interests
  2. Importance of the Night Sky to the Cultural, Spiritual and Historical Worlds
  3. Importance of the Night Sky to Human Health
  4. Achieving Dark Sky Compliance through Voluntary and Regulatory Means
  5. Recommendations from the Symposium Theme Sessions

Terms of Use
© EcologyoftheNight.org - Muskoka Heritage Foundation, 2004