THEME
#4 ACHIEVING DARK SKY COMPLIANCE THROUGH VOLUNTARY AND REGULATORY
MEANS
The participants
in this session agree that behaviour change was needed in all areas:
|
Property
owners
Residential
Commercial
Industry
Manufacturers
Architects
Designers
Developers
Dealers
Contractors
Professional
associations such as OPPI, AMCTO, OPWA, OGRA, and Landscape
Ontario
Provincial
Government
Ministry
of Transportation
Boards
of Education
|
Community
groups
Ratepayers
Service
clubs
Citizen
advisory groups
Environmental
alliances
Municipalities
Heads
and members of local councils
CAOs,
lawyers, engineers, planners
Association
of Municipalities of Ontario
Others
Insurance
companies
|
When the group
considered the options for facilitating change, they came up with
a wide range of choice.
- Media campaigns
- TV commercials (TVO), trade magazines, Science TV
- Extended
public awareness campaigns focusing on the health issues
- Incorporating
the matter into lesson plans for the school curriculum and offering
extra-curricular education programs e.g. through service clubs
such as Boy Scouts/ Girl Guides etc.
- Developing
standardized municipal by-laws by offering templates
- Encouraging
provincial policy statements
- Encouraging
laws at the provincial and federal levels
- Encouraging
corporate direction buying policy (for commercial enterprises
such as Loblaws, Canadian Tire, Wal-Mart)
- Offering
NGO certification of products
The group suggested
that it might be effective to employ the strategy of leading by
example followed by outreach. The participants suggested that training
be offered to the decision-makers, regulators, and enforcers. Financial
incentives are often used to change behaviour and were suggested
to encourage night sky friendly behaviour. Often, partnering with
existing programs works to bring attention to a new issue. If light
pollution is paired with general health promotion or if a cub badge
is offered in dark sky friendliness, the message may be better communicated.
When asked to
consider the barriers to the successful implementation of the options
noted above, the group cited ignorance of the issue as the prime
barrier Lack of knowledge and lack of awareness. The level
of potential liability (e.g. crime, vandalism) with respect to adverse
effects of different illumination needs to be demonstrated for municipalities
and businesses alike.
The group agreed
that limited resources and competing issues and agendas make it
difficult to obtain the attention of government agencies.
The problem
of the financial cost of implementing the options was thought to
be considerable in terms of capital outlay, engineering expense
and administrative costs (e.g. for enforcement). And the cost of
lighting conversion was considered as a potential hardship for businesses.
|
Participants
Brian
Whitehead
Jim LaFramboise
Remi Lacasse
Terence Dickinson
Tony Rutenberg
Chloe Legris
Peter Ryback
Robert Cowie
Barb Heidenreich
Robert Dick
Dorothy Shaver
David Welch
Martin Damus
Michael Barry
Rick Stankiewicz
|
Moderator
David
Gibson
|
Recorder
Jill
Attwood
|
|
THEME
SUMMARIES MENU
- Scientific
and Biological Interests
- Importance
of the Night Sky to the Cultural, Spiritual and Historical Worlds
- Importance
of the Night Sky to Human Health
- Achieving
Dark Sky Compliance through Voluntary and Regulatory Means
- Recommendations
from the Symposium Theme Sessions
|